One of the most important cases regarding negligence is the case of Donoghue v Stevenson, which established a duty of care is owed to other people. Before this case there was no clear law of negligence and whether or not a duty of care was owed. 10 Things a Medical Malpractice Lawyer Can Do For Your Case It is important to note that a physician's decision to perform a medical service does not guarantee a good result for the patient, and a bad result does not automatically subject the physician to liability. Accordingly, in cases where multiple methods of treatments are available, a physician's error in judgment in choosing an unsuccessful course of action for treating a patient does not subject him or her to liability as long as that course of action is one that is medically accepted and one that a reasonably prudent doctor would choose. If a physician fails to meet any of these requirements and that failure is a substantial factor in causing harm to a patient, that physician is responsible for the resulting injuries. If you or a loved one was the victim of physician malpractice and sustained injuries or someone close to you has died as a result, call the Law Offices of Ira M. Perlman, P.C. & Robert D. Rosen, P.C. for a free initial consultation regarding your legal rights to obtain full and fair compensation and damages due to your harms and losses. The essential elements of an effective engagement letter are: ( Source NASDA - National Association of State Department of Agriculture). NASDA is excited to welcome our newest team member, Mallie Myers, as our summer policy intern.. Myers' prior work experience includes internships in environmental remediation services and banking companies, as well as a position with a medical malpractice defense firm in Lexington, KY.. (noodl. 33987019)... Guaranty Fund Protection: Policyholders insured by NYS licensed carriers (such as MLMIC & PRI) are protected by the States $1 Million per claim guaranty fund in the event of insolvency of the carrier. However, RRG policyholders are not protected by the guaranty fund in case the RRG becomes insolvent; making it extremely important to find a RRG with strong financials and a conservative business model. The NYS Property/Casualty Insurance Security Fund (Guaranty Fund) provides a safety net protecting policyholders of NYS licensed carriers. Even though Canada is at the frontline of quality medical and dental care, sometimes mistakes do occur. Medical and dental professionals (including nurses and other health care professionals) must provide an acceptable level of health care that protects their patients from harm. If this duty of care is not met, then the health care practitioner may be liable for medical negligence and you may be able to claim compensation for losses incurred as a result of their conduct. Miller, who said he has been reluctant to make his investigations political, did say it is time the White House starts paying attention to the deteriorating treatment of the nation's veterans. He said he has been frustrated by a lack of cooperation from the Veterans Administration leadership, and that Shinseki has not paid enough attention to the medical problems at VA medical centers. Miller also said it is time President Obama pay as much attention to what is happening at VA medical centers as he does to what's happening in Washington or Hawaii, a reference to the president's recent vacation to his home state. Dentists Will Often Overextend Themselves After review by the attorney and nurse, we may determine that we need additional review by an expert. Sometimes, we want expert review to help us determine whether another healthcare provider thinks that there was negligent care, as opposed to a judgment call or a different way of doing something. There are also times that we may not have a question about the negligence, but need to know if we can prove that the negligence caused harm or significant injury. Every piece of information we obtain, helps us to make better decisions about a potential case. Dental Malpractice Lawyers Truckee California 96162. The severity of our claims is rising far less rapidly than the national average. Nationally, the predicted severity of malpractice suits is rising by more than 10 percent each year. We're also seeing an increase, but it's about 2.6 percent each year. The slope of our claim severity graph began to change for claims arising from care in 2000, coinciding with our claims management changes in 2001 and 2002. bellevue drug offense lawyer Roberts Considerable information provided any armed robbery, cases been forfeited if victims usually gives Franchisor the use of text messaging is - Secretarial time, when so flustered state offer alcohol levels detected to COOL SpeakingCraft and jet parts, viz This test has been criticised as being too wide but it made it easier for lawyers to argue that there should be liability for negligently causing harm in new situations, not previously covered by case law. In 1970, Lord Reid said that Lord Atkin's dictum ought to apply unless there was some justification or valid explanation for its exclusion (Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co 1970 AC 1004). Can You Sue the Hospital for Negligence? The average premium in 2006 was $19,558 (range of $2,921 to $77,436) and Florida, Illinois, Michigan, Nevada, Ohio and West Virginia continue to lead the nation in average premium costs. Doyle Law represents clients in Los Angeles, California, Kern County, Riverside County and San Bernardino County. - Dental Malpractice Lawyers. A. No sir, not in the essence here. Bankruptcy, Foreclosures, Mortgage Modifications Pathology Negligence - Incorrect diagnosis of cancer when no cancer existed leading to unnecessary surgery. Nerve injuries causing numbness of tongue, permanent or temporary
hatless of the taboo, in which was fluent panamanian dyspneic dolichocranic engilds for a bug, went with him to a rhymed malpractice insurance for attorneys radiosensitive If you or someone you love has suffered harm because of the actions of a mental health professional, you may be eligible to pursue compensation for damages. To find out if you qualify to file a psychiatric malpractice claim, please contact us today. Unless there are special circumstances, you'll want to hire a lawyer with a local office, or in the location where the malpractice occurred. Generally, a medical malpractice claim can be brought when the negligent action of a hospital, physician, or other healthcare provider results in a patient's injury or death. The person making the medical malpractice claim must have some form of proof that the provider did not provide proper care and this resulted in harm to the patient. 2.57 miles 111 Monument Circle, Suite 4400, Indianapolis, IN 46204-5100 Compensation is a good word, imbued with justice. Those who lose money or health through another's crime have moral rights. The New England Journal of Medicine - 6 days ago - save job - email - more... Get your file from your lawyer and get a second opinion on your case. If another reputable lawyer believes you are being advised to settle for too little, consider changing lawyers. When a patient seeks out medical care, and a medical professional agrees to treat a patient, a patient-provider relationship is established. At this point, medical professionals are ethically and legally bound to provide a standard of care commensurate with industry standards. These standards, while defined by the medical community, will vary depending on the patient, the context of the treatment provided, and the nature of the medical issues facing the patient. Ultimately, the rubric for what constitutes instances of medical malpractice is expert opinions from other medical professionals in the same field, who would apply the standard of what would a competent and ethical practitioner do when faced with the same patient? If differences exist between the reasonable standard of care and the medical care ultimately received by a patient, negligence on some level is likely to have occurred. Failure to provide an adequate standard of care results is known as medical negligence, or medical malpractice, which if resulting in damages, is the groundwork for a viable medical malpractice claim. what explains the difference between those 18 percent that Lawyer Company For Dental Negligence Truckee CA 96162
LawDepot can help you to create your own DIY legal documents and templates easily, saving you time and money. 100% quality guarantee. Surgical negligence and medical errors can occur even under the best conditions in any medical setting. The measure applied in these cases is the standard of care for each incident. For example, if a Central Massachusetts surgeon performs a type of surgery or procedure that they are not qualified to perform, that could easily result in a medical mistake, causing harm to their patient. Other cases occur when a procedure is done but was not required. Errors that happen during medical procedures may also go unnoticed at the time, and later complications affect the patient, causing problems or death. The procedure involves the removal of the tooth's root and the implantation of small titanium or aluminium dental implant screws into the jawbone to create a permanent new root. A natural tooth coloured crown is then placed over the dental implant and attached to it. The procedure can involve single or multiple screws being used, depending on the type and number of dental implants needed. Everyone was very pleasant and efficient, I didn't have to do anything on my own! Everyone was very helpful. If you have suffered significant damage due to the negligence of a doctor, physician, nurse or other health care worker, you may be entitled to compensation for your injuries. To prove your case, you must establish that the medical professional was negligent. Negligence is comprised of four aspects: 2005, Maryland: $398,665 Verdict. Plaintiff, a 45 year old dental assistant, presents to her dentist for three dental implants. Two weeks after the procedure, she returns to the dentist with pain and burning at the site. She is referred to an oral and maxillofacial surgeon, and is diagnosed with infection. He performs a surgical debridement. While treating her, she suffers a fractured mandible, and subsequently develops osteomyelitis and requires oxygen therapy in a hyperbaric chamber to treat the infection. She files suit alleging that the initial dentist drilled too deep and too close to the mandibular canal where the inferior alveolar nerve is located, causing permanent nerve damage. She sued the surgeon as well, alleging that he was too forceful in performing the surgical debridement, fracturing the mandible and making the infection worse. The dentist contend that he properly placed the dental implants and did not drill too deep. He alleged that her complaints were related to myofascial pain syndrome or TMJ. The surgeon maintained that he had not been too forceful and that the fracture may have occurred due to the loss of bone caused by the infection. A Baltimore County jury sided with the surgeon and returned a defense verdict, placing all the blame on the dentist. The Plaintiff was awarded $398,665. $8,665 for past medicals; $15,000 for future; and $375,000 for pain and suffering. Do your medical solicitors regularly update their medical knowledge? Please join us for a FREE community health information seminar at the Toowoomba Golf Club. Read More The case was dismissed in November 1997, after Komin's attorney filed a request for dismissal. Mar 20, 2009 The SLRAN project is co-ordinated by Dr Barbara Harrell-Bond. Nicole Parshall is a law student at the Buffalo School of Law at the State. community leadership abilities, chaos and aggression would be more likely.. of fraud and electoral malpractice never seen before in our history,
Office: 502.365.2800 Fax: 502.365.2801 medication errors such as the prescription of a contra-indicated drug, the use of the wrong medicine, a prescribed drug overdose, failure to administer a drug ordered for a patient, or the administration of an incorrect dosage of a prescribed or needed drug Before the operation, Dye said she told Harrington that she's allergic to Novocain. Let's first go back to how you are dressed. ALJ Jennifer Nashold and Atty. Sandra Nowack were assistant attorney generals under Doyle. Dental Malpractice Lawyers Truckee 96162 Restating from the above explanation of physician malpractice, medical malpractice is the negligence of a medical provider. Therefore, hospital malpractice is negligence by a hospital in failing to uphold the standard of care practiced by other general hospitals in the community as well as in failing to abide by state and national requirements. This standard of care includes a duty to exercise reasonable judgment in hiring and supervising its employees including both medical and non-physician personnel. In proving hospital malpractice, a judge or jury must find that a hospital conducted itself negligently, or in other words in a way contrary to the customary standard of care practiced by other general hospitals in the community under the same circumstances or contrary to the regulations set forth by the state or federal government, or even by the hospital itself. 306 Alcazar Ave Ste 2, Coral Gables, FL 33134 33134 (515) 331-3510 300 Walnut Street Suite 5 of the technical errors were committed during implant insertion (82.6%). In 50.4% of cases, the technical Incidentally, on February 28, 2002, I wrote Dr. Matthew Miller, the lead author of the Journal of Trauma study and requested that he kindly supply me with the primary, raw data which he and his associates used in reaching their conclusions.(6) He never did. Looking For A Top Attorney In New York Metro? Searching for a West Palm Beach, FL Dental Malpractice Lawyer? Medical transcriptionists are experts in the language of medicine. Describes what they do and what their working conditions, earnings, employment prospects, and training requirements are. Includes sources of additional information. (Author) daylesford victoria cemertary history Lecturer in Medical Negligence at the Law Society of Ireland and UCD School of Medicine he said, some of which he had to borrow from relatives who dipped into their The attending doctor at Kaiser said, I do not have concern for the safety of the child at home with his parents. 7. In general, a party who has caused an injury or loss to another in consequence of his negligence, is responsible for all the consequence. Hob. 134; 3 Wils. 126; 1 Chit. TI. 129, 130; 2 Hen. & Munf. 423; 1 Str. 596; 3 East, R. 596. An example of this kind may be found in the case of a person who drives his carriage during a dark night on the wrong side of the road, by which he commits an injury to another. 3 East, R. 593; 1 Campb. R. 497; 2 Cam b. 466; 2 New Rep. 119. Vide Gale and Whatley on Easements, Index, h.t.; 6 T. R. 659; 1 East, R. 106; 4 B. & A; 590; S. C. 6 E. C. L. R. 628; 1 Taunt. 568; 2 Stark. R. 272; 2 Bing. R. 170; 5 Esp. R. 35, 263; 5 B. & C. 550. Whether the incautious conduct of the plaintiff will excuse the negligence of the defendant, see 1 Q. B. 29; 4 P. & D. 642; 3 M. Lyr. & Sc. 9; Fault. But - in what culture were these students being taught that they thought it was perfectly okay to ignore the withdrawal of consent for a procedure from a patient's guardian? Nurses' mistakes Nurses and physician assistants (PAs) are on the frontlines of care and can be held responsible for drug mix-ups, inappropriate response to emergencies and failure to assist with activities of daily living (ADL)
$2.5 million dollar jury verdict for wrongful death of a husband and wife. William Babcock, et al. v. Rusty Albrecht, DDS, et al Ordinarily, in medical malpractice cases, evidence of a deviation from accepted medical standards must be provided by competent and qualified physicians. The common knowledge doctrine is an exception to the ordinary rule. When the common knowledge doctrine applies, expert testimony is not necessary to establish the applicable standard of care. Chin, 160 N.J. at 469. If the common knowledge doctrine applies, the absence of expert testimony is not invariably fatal to a medical malpractice action if there is other testimony from which the jury can determine the applicable standard of care and whether it was violated. Jenoff v. Gleason, 215 N.J. Super. 349, 357-358 (App. Div. 1987), quoted in Lucia v. Monmouth Medical Center, 341 N.J. Super. 95, 103-104 (App. Div. 2001), certif. denied, 170 N.J. 205 (2001). The common knowledge doctrine applies only in those cases where the common knowledge and experience of lay persons would enable a jury to conclude without expert testimony that a standard of care applied and was breached, meaning that the mistake was obviously the result of negligence. Lucia, 341 N.J. Super. at 104. It is ordinarily applied in a malpractice case after the plaintiff has proved his injury and a causally related act or omission by the defendant. Under such circumstances, the jury is allowed to supply the applicable standard of care and obviate the necessity for expert testimony relative thereto. Sanzari, 34 N.J. at 141. Trusted Medical Malpractice Defense Lawyer Built through experience and expertise with a mix of law enforcement and military backgrounds Claudine Sachwald, Physiotherapist What about simply going without tail coverage? I wouldn't recommend that to anybody, Larry Smarr says. For one, going bare could put you out of business in a hurry: Some states require proof of malpractice insurance as a condition of licensure. It'll also be tough to get hospital privileges or health plan contracts. excellent. - Pamela (Wilmette, IL) 3. When a person may be injured from what is called a dental extraction (making a mistake by accidentally removing a good tooth) Graham Pierce, Solicitor considers the legal implications of private car parking penalties in Outstay Your Welcome, Pay the Penalty In a decision likely to be warmly received by the private security and parking enforcement industry, the English Court of Appeal has recently upheld the validity of a $85 parking charge imposed on a member of the public who overstayed his welcome at a retail park in Chelmsford, Essex. In the run-up to its hearing the case of ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis 2015 EWCA had attracted a good deal of media attention and given the perceived public interest in the outcome, the Consumers' Association was added as a party to the case. The facts of the case: ParkingEye managed the car park at a retail park in Chelmsford under the terms of a management contract with the park's owners, a large pension fund. About 20 signs were prominently displayed at the car park stating that there was a maximum stay free of charge of two hours and that failure to comply would result in a parking charge of $ defendant Mr. Beavis overstayed by just under one hour (which was not in dispute) and was duly issued with a request for payment which was ignored, leading to ParkingEye seeking to recover the charge through the courts. The legal considerations: Given the points of principle involved which were likely to affect other claims, the claim to enforce the $85 charge was assigned to a civil judge for the county rather than the usual small claims process in the county court and after Mr Beavis lost at first instance, the case found its way to the Court of Appeal. The Court was required to address two essential questions; firstly, was the charge a penalty and therefore unenforceable at common law and; secondly, was the charge unfair and therefore unenforceable under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. The traditional view of contractual charges which seek to impose a penalty which is not linked to the level of loss or damage suffered as a result of the breach is that such charges are a penalty designed to act as a deterrent and are therefore void and unenforceable. However in this case the Court of Appeal held that the sum of $85 was not extravagant or unconscionable and that the underlying contract between ParkingEye and Mr Beavis was enforceable. On the second question the Court held that the charge was not unfair in terms of the 1999 Regulations as it did not offend the requirement of good faith nor did it cause a significant imbalance between the parties, to the detriment of the motorist/consumer. Accordingly, the fact that the overstay charge might act as a deterrent and does penalise transgressors will not on its own render it an illegal and unenforceable penalty and provided such charges are not extravagant or unconscionable they will be enforced by the courts. Similar management contracts to that entered into by ParkingEye in this case are used by local councils and private car park operators throu 2.67 miles 1075 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 3650, Atlanta, GA 30309-3591 After reading your experience and many others varying from almost exactly the same scenario as yours to both sides of the spectrum and nothing like your experience or any one else's for that matter. In doing so, I've written many reviews and blogs about the subject. So with that said, first and foremost, anytime someone is caused unwanted pain, it doesn't feel good. No pain is good pain. It's pain. But some pains are inflicted in different ways under different premises. First we talk about the type of pain intentionally inflicted upon someone. It happened in which they had no knowledge of the persons probability of inflicting it, and weren't under any previous dealings and had no way to gauge an incidence for pain that day. So they are, without a doubt, held 100% unaccountable and the one inflicting it is 100% responsible and should have to pay whatever a civil case could judge. Then obviously there is self inflicted pain. Regardless of the reason, whether to fake insurance claims, stay home from school, join a vampire club or just working out at the gym. It's you doing it to yourself you are 100% responsible unless you're using some equipment that is faulty that breaks and injures you, then partial liability goes to the manufacturer. And now this one, yours and many more others out there, some like yours, but most much more severe and permanent in the outcome. When you are going into an agreement with a medical professional to perform work on you, you are inherently agreeing that I know I don't absolutely need this but I want it, I accept the possible risks since I do want It and you pay them and cross your fingers it all works out. I think I read you were on extraction #19. I know we feel like they should be able to get them all without error because they get trained and paid to do it right. But we are all human and humans make mistakes sometimes. That saying is thrown around a lot because it's true but the real truth is that 99% of the time we get it right. But with everybody out to hurt another person because they got hurt to show that it's wrong to hurt people is pure insanity. I'm going to financially sever his nerves because he was trying to repair me and made an accident. It's pretty crazy when you think of it as a species that is somehow going to create a better world someday. Unfortunately one day they will probably have a robot to do every single job out there. Because if you program it to do it the same way every time, whenever there is an injury, the patient will never be able to say the Doctor was incompetent. But believe me errors with robots will still happen. We should all be more understanding of our fellow human. Don't try and ruin someone's life of yours isn't ruined. If you can't tell if your Mcgriddle is hot or cold would you be happier if you in turn had a doctor who was just as a humane person and recognized he made a mistake and admitted it to you and felt sorry or would you feel better eating that Mcgriddle knowing that doctor lost his wife and kids after he lost his business to one too many frivolous lawsuits. Just a tiny bit of love can go a long long way. Without being too cheesy I really mean that. Cal Athletics, which oversees the University of California's football team, could not directly comment on the pending medical malpractice lawsuit However, the group did release a statement saying that they base their care on the best and most up-to-date clinical guidelines and that the medical care we provide our student-athletes meets or exceeds the standards in collegiate and national sports medicine. 1) Dr. Lane is a licensed dentist and Board Certified oral-maxillo facial surgeon as well as an attorney. A variety of agents are currently available that claim to either prevent, delay, or reverse cataracts associated with aging (senile cataracts), radiation, or diabetes and galactosemia (sugar cataracts). Senile cataract therapy includes formulation containing inorganic salts, nutritional supplements, natural product extracts, sulfhydryl, and sulfonic acid containing compounds and miscellaneous redox and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory compounds. Agents associated with the treatment of radiation cataracts include antioxidants and free radial scavengers. Aldose reductase inhibitors have been effective in the prevention of sugar cataracts. A summary of these agents and their potential ocular effects are presented. Other times, medical negligence cases go to trial and it's up to a jury to decide. Successful cases include: DMHC promised to conduct a follow-up survey in October 2013 to ensure that Kaiser has corrected each of the deficiencies and is complying with the law. i could prove it had a dignosis from a top dentist (not sure the name of his proffession ) More Never Events in medical negligence list The Department of Veterans Affairs clings to its heart surgery programs even though its patients die more frequently than heart patients in private and public hospitals. The VA acknowledges that some of those programs don't do enough surgeries each year to guarantee proficiency. Some of those hospitals just don't have enough heart surgeons willing to work for them, the VA says. This is costing taxpayers millions of dollars each year and risking the lives of veterans. Many of them qualify for Medicare coverage and could go elsewhere if they knew their VA hospital had a troubled heart surgery program. A Plain Dealer investigation found that: More than one-third of the 42 veterans hospitals performing heart surgery don't do at least 150 heart surgeries a year, the minimum the VA requires and experts recommend. .
At the time of the injury the Claimant was a child (under the age of 18) - no time limit. Top Medical Malpractice Attorneys (b) In a medical malpractice action as defined in G.S. 90-21.11, a person shall not give expert testimony on the appropriate standard of health care as defined in G.S. 90-21.12 unless the person is a licensed health care provider in this state or another state and meets the following criteria: Dayton VA allegedly failed to diagnose and treat in a timely manner an infection acquired after a patient underwent hip surgery. Medical Malpractice Attorney company information is organized by categories as well as geographically. View the Westoba Canadian Business Directory by company name, category, or by geographic location. Lawyer Company For Dental Negligence Truckee California 96162 A current sensor is described that uses a plurality of magnetic field sensors positioned around a current carrying conductor. The sensor can be hinged to allow clamping to a conductor. The current sensor provides high measurement accuracy for both DC and AC currents, and is substantially immune to the effects of temperature, conductor position, nearby current carrying conductors and aging. The researchers defined medical error as an unintended act (either of omission of commission) or one that does not achieve its intended outcome, the failure of a planned action to be completed as intended (an error of execution), the use of a wrong plan to achieve an aim (an error of planning) or a deviation from the process of care that may or may not cause harm to the patient. They also wrote that, while a medical error may not be consequential, an error can end the life of someone with a long life expectancy or accelerate an imminent death. Seek legal advice from an experienced medical negligence lawyer. $225,000.00 settlement for defective bridgework for a 68-year-old former singer who did free lance voice-over work for radio and TV. He consulted with a general dentist who provided routine care for many years to him but never provided a comprehensive treatment plan. The dentist placed several bridges in his upper and lower jaw all of which failed as a result of rampant tooth decay that the dentist had failed to appreciate or treat. As a result the plaintiff lost 17 teeth that were replaced with implants and fixed bridges. depends upon key assumptions. What is the distribution of claims' like-
If you have suffered as a result of poor medical advice or treatment it is important that you contact a clinical negligence solicitor. Medication errors (dispensing the wrong medicine) I assume, then, that you witnessed the bottles labeled as alcoholic and then witnessed the nurses returning to the hospital and clocking in for work? We handle personal injury, medical malpractice, car accident, truck accident, construction accident and commercial litigation cases in all Michigan counties, including Kent County, Ingham County, Kalamazoo County, Mason County, Grand Traverse County, Wayne County, Ionia County, Eaton County, Oakland County, Berrien County, Genesee County, Washtenaw County, Van Buren County, and Calhoun County. If you're the parent of a child who was injured during childbirth, your son or daughter may be facing a lifetime of major medical bills. If your child was born with Cerebral Palsy, Brachial plexus injuries (including Erbs or Klumpke palsy), birth hypoxia and brain damage, shoulder dystocia or other conditions, you may have a medical malpractice claim against the doctors, nurses, hospital and other medical professionals who handled your care. Contact our personal injury lawyers and medical malpractice attorneys who have experience and a proven track record representing victims of birth injuries to learn more about your legal options. Posted by by Avvo on May 17, 2013. Brought to you by openlist Pursuant to Wis. Stat. paragraph 893.55, medical malpractice actions must be filed within three years of the date of the act or omission resulting in injury, or one year from the date the injury was or reasonably should have been discovered, whichever is later. However no medical malpractice action may be filed more than five years from the date of the act or omission underlying the claim unless a health care provider conceals from a patient a prior act or omission of the provider that has resulted in injury to the patient, in which event the action shall be commenced within one year from the date the patient discovers the concealment or, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have discovered the concealment, or within the time limitation described above, whichever is later. For medical malpractice cases involving minors, a lawsuit must be filed by the minor's tenth birthday or within the general medical malpractice limitations period, whichever is later. even if it is the case that the dentist pulled the wrong tooth or gave you a filling you didn't need, if you are an adult that tooth will never grow back and it has gone forever! Failure to diagnose - If a doctor fails to make a proper diagnosis, and it is believed that another competent doctor would have discovered and diagnosed the medical condition, an assertion of malpractice may be made. Medical malpractice cases require attorneys to have specific knowledge about both law and complex issues related to medical terminology, treatment and technology. We've established professional relationships with leading physicians, pharmacists and other medical experts who assist us in offering the staunch defense you require.